Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
The Supreme Court has ruled in multiple cases what constitutes an important government interest and therefore satisfies the first prong of intermediate scrutiny.
Intermediate scrutiny, in U.S. constitutional law, is the second level of deciding issues using judicial review. The other levels are typically referred to as rational basis review (least rigorous) and strict scrutiny (most rigorous).
United States v. O'Brien. No. 232. Argued January 24, 1968. Decided May 27, 1968* 391 U.S. 367. Syllabus. O'Brien burned his Selective Service registration certificate before a sizable crowd in order to influence others to adopt his anti-war beliefs.
This case is known for the development of the intermediate scrutiny standard, which places the burden on the government to justify a gender-based classification by identifying an important objective and a substantial relation between the objective and the means chosen to achieve it.
Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling that statutory or administrative sex classifications were subject to intermediate scrutiny under the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.
Strict scrutiny is usually triggered when a government action involves a “suspect classification,” such as race, religion, national origin, or alienage (lack of citizenship). Intermediate scrutiny is usually triggered by a “quasi-suspect classification,” such as gender or legitimacy.
10 Φεβ 2022 · As did the district court, Judge Walker found that intermediate scrutiny applied. Section 922 (g) (5) imposed a categorical ban on the possession of firearms by undocumented immigrants, and so the burden on Perez’s presumed Second Amendment rights was “insurmountable.” 37 However, his interest in possessing firearms was not at the “core ...
