Yahoo Αναζήτηση Διαδυκτίου

Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης

  1. Combined with the very mild recoil and very good accuracy of the cartridge, the 6.5 Swede rapidly gained a reputation for effectiveness on big game like moose and reindeer. Over the years, the 6.5×55 Swede became very popular in Europe.

  2. 15 Απρ 2019 · The 6.5×55 case has 6 or 7% more capacity than the .260s, even more in practice when both are loaded to standard COALs with heavy bullets, which sees them having to seated very deep in the .260 Rem using up quite a lot of powder capacity.

  3. 19 Δεκ 2007 · The 260 Rem has a water capacity of 53 grains of water. The 6.5x55 has 57 grains capacity of water. What does the 260 AI have? If it comes up to the 6.5x55 level why the heck waste time messing with the 260 AI? Especially when you can buy Lapua brass in 6.5x55.

  4. 14 Ιουν 2015 · The 6.5×55 case has 6 or 7% more capacity than the .260s, even more in practice when both are loaded to standard COALs with heavy bullets, which sees them having to seated very deep in the .260 Rem using up quite a lot of powder capacity.

  5. 12 Ιουν 2014 · One of our Shooters' Forum readers, Trent from Louisiana, asked for help deciding between a .260 Remington and a 6.5x55 for his latest gun project. In the Forum thread, respected UK gun writer Laurie Holland provided a good summary of the differences between the two chamberings.

  6. 26 Αυγ 2022 · The Creedmoor uses a case that is 0.115 inch shorter than the .260 and has a 30-degree shoulder to the Remington’s 20-degree shoulder. Despite its shorter case, the Creedmoor has roughly the same capacity as the .260 Rem.: 52.5 grains of water for the 6.5 versus 53.5 grains for the .260.

  7. 13 Ιουν 2024 · The .260 Remington case will hold about 2 percent more powder than a 6.5 Creedmoor case, but since the Creedmoor can be factory loaded to a higher pressure, velocities are near identical.

  1. Γίνεται επίσης αναζήτηση για