Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
5 ημέρες πριν · The California Appellate Courts Case Information System provides case information for California Supreme Court and Court of Appeal cases, including copies of opinions, both published and unpublished. Case information is updated once an hour throughout the business day.
- Archive of Web Pages Cited in Opinions Issued by The Supreme Court of California
Criminal Law; Civil Appeals; Gender Change; Wills, Estates,...
- Published/Citable Opinions
Court of Appeal slip opinions are posted throughout the day...
- Archive of Web Pages Cited in Opinions Issued by The Supreme Court of California
Court of Appeal slip opinions are posted throughout the day as soon after filing as possible. Use the filter below to select the slip opinions that you wish to view. After 120 days, these opinions remain available via our Case Information Search tool.
Justia Opinion Summary. In this case, two gang members were walking together in their gang’s territory where they both lived. Police detained the pair and arrested defendant after retrieving a knife from his pants pocket.
Manhan v. Gallagher. Tenants sued for breach of contract and bad faith retention of $4,800 from a security deposit; they subsequently moved to compel responses to requests for admission and interrogatories and requested sanctions ($3,060). Orders granting the sanctions were filed on March 20.
1 ημέρα πριν · independent law enforcement oversight authority.” (Id. at p. 921.) Generally, a trial court’s ruling on a Pitchess motion is reviewed for abuse of discretion. (People v. Cruz (2008) 44 Cal.4th 636, 670.) But where, as here, the facts are undisputed and the correctness of the court’s Pitchess ruling turns on a question of law, our review ...
What is a published opinion? All opinions of the California Supreme Court are published in bound volumes called the Official Reports. Some opinions issued by the California Courts of Appeal are certified for publication by the Court of Appeal or ordered published by the Supreme Court because they meet criteria established in California Rules of Court, rule 8.1105.
On appeal, defendant argued: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in imposing certain fines and fees despite his inability to pay, and this violated his right to due process under California v. Dueñas, 30 Cal.App.5th 1157 (2019); and (2) the criminal protective order was unconstitutionally vague because its stay-away provision did not ...
