Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
In the US, you can probably live in government-owned wilderness, so long as you don't make any changes to the environment (build a structure, chop down trees, till a farm) and follow all the other rules about hunting & fishing seasons/licenses, weapon carry, waste disposal, open fires, etc.
I have done just that off and on for many years. National Forests, Wilderness areas one must except if you make yourself known and in the open you will be asked to move after a certain time. However if you know what you are doing you can live with out leaving a trace. My latest adventure was living 6 years in the wilderness of Alaska, yes the Bush.
The wilderness is legally owned by someone, whether the government, people, or other organisations, and you need their permission to live on their land. And while the Antarctic wilderness is not owned, it is protected by the antarctic treaties and you would legally be in violation of them.
1 Αυγ 2014 · Here are the pros and cons of living in the wilderness, from a girl who lives in a cabin in the Alaskan woods: Pros. It’s private. When you’re living in the wilderness, you get a whole...
17 Σεπ 2024 · Part 1. Preparing to Go Off-Grid. Download Article. 1. Figure out the course of action appropriate for your environment. The skills needed to stay in subzero Alaska versus the woods of mainland Europe versus the Sahara Desert are all incredibly different. [2] . Think of these vary basic things first:
As long as you don't live on private property then yes. You could live for free, providing you could sustain food year round.
15 Ιουλ 2021 · Living in the wilderness will require you learn survival skills based on the conditions in the place you want to live. Before anything else, determine the climate, available resources, and potential hazards in your chosen environment.
