Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
22 Σεπ 2008 · Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-0594-N, 2005 WL 5873510 (N.D.Tex. Dec. 14, 2005), citing Goodyear Tire Rubber Co. v. Hercules Tire Rubber Co., 162 F.3d 1113 (Fed. Cir. 1998). After comparing the claimed design and the accused product, the court held that Swisa's allegedly infringing product did not incorporate ...
22 Σεπ 2008 · Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., 543 F.3d 665 (Fed. Cir.2008), United States of America. Date of Judgment September 22, 2008. Issuing Authority Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Level of the Issuing Authority Appellate Instance. Type of Procedure Judicial (Civil) Subject Matter Industrial Designs. Keywords.
Get Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., 543 F.3d 665 (2008), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.
In the seminal decision of Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., the Federal Circuit struck down one of the two tests commonly used for determining design patent infringement, the “point of novelty” test.
13 Ιαν 2009 · Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., 2005 WL 5873510 (N.D.Tex.). Egyptian Goddess appealed and a panel of the Federal Circuit affirmed, issuing an opinion that, according to some commentators, confused the state of design patent infringement law even further.
Read Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-0594-N, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database.
27 Σεπ 2008 · Applying the newly-adopted test to the present case, the Federal Circuit affirmed, holding that no reasonable fact finder could find that an ordinary observer, familiar with the prior art, would deem Swisa’s design to be the same as Eyptian’s patented design.
