Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
22 Σεπ 2008 · Appellant Egyptian Goddess, Inc., ("EGI") brought this action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, alleging that Swisa, Inc., and Dror Swisa (collectively, "Swisa") had infringed EGI's U.S. Design Patent No. 467,389 ("the 389 patent").
Get Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., 543 F.3d 665 (2008), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.
In the seminal decision of Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., the Federal Circuit struck down one of the two tests commonly used for determining design patent infringement, the “point of novelty” test.
22 Σεπ 2008 · Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., 543 F.3d 665 (Fed. Cir.2008), United States of America. Date of Judgment September 22, 2008. Issuing Authority Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Level of the Issuing Authority Appellate Instance. Type of Procedure Judicial (Civil) Subject Matter Industrial Designs. Keywords.
27 Σεπ 2008 · The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the decision of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas, which had granted summary judgment in favor of Swisa, Inc, finding that no jury could reasonably find Swisa’s nail-buffer design infringed Egyptian Goddess’s design patent.
Read Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., Civil Action No. 3:03-CV-0594-N, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database.
13 Σεπ 2013 · In 2008, the Federal Circuit radically overhauled the test for design patent infringement in Egyptian Goddess v. Swisa, or so many commentators at the time predicted.
