Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
9 Ιουλ 2024 · When it comes to system monitoring tools, HWiNFO and HWMonitor are two popular options that provide valuable insights into the performance of your computer. In this article, we will compare these tools in detail to help you determine which one reigns supreme.
If you’ve spent any amount of time in the world of benchmarking, stress-testing your PC, or even if you’re just curious about how toasty that Ryzen 9 7950X is getting, you’ll have no doubt heard of HWMonitor and HWiNFO. On the surface, they serve a very similar purpose.
If I have hwinfo open it's margin of error between the two. If I do any overclock testing, more than just checking temps or something, I'll generally use hwinfo. The reason I open hwmon is because it's way smaller in terms of se air count, I don't really want to look at 3000 rows of sensors most of which are redindant when I want to see CPU ...
HWMonitor mostly focuses on immediate, min, and max values. For basic temperature monitoring they both work well enough. If you are trying to solve issues by monitoring power/frequency/temps etc I would use HWInfo.
4 Φεβ 2020 · Run HWinfo and look at system voltages and other sensor readings. Monitoring temperatures, core speeds, voltages, clock ratios and other reported sensor data can often help to pick out an issue...
17 Νοε 2024 · Yes, HWInfo. It not only has more features, but is much more reliable. HWMonitor is infamous for giving false readings on modern hardware, especially on Ryzen.
Compare HWMonitor vs. HWiNFO using this comparison chart. Compare price, features, and reviews of the software side-by-side to make the best choice for your business.
