Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
The Supreme Court ruled in Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta that state governments have the authority to prosecute certain cases on tribal lands, effectively undermining centuries of legal precedent.
30 Ιουν 2022 · In 2015, respondent Victor Manuel Castro-Huerta was charged by the State of Oklahoma for child neglect. Castro-Huerta was convicted in state court and sentenced to 35 years of imprisonment. While Castro-Huerta’s state-court appeal was pending, this Court decided McGirt v. Oklahoma, 591 U. S. ___.
On July 9, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in the case McGirt v. Oklahoma that much of the state of Oklahoma falls within an Indian reservation, potentially one of the most consequential legal decisions for Native Americans in decades that could have far-reaching implications.
10 Ιουλ 2020 · The Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma received less attention than two other decisions handed down the same day, which concerned whether President Trump is immune from...
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. Syllabus. McGIRT v. OKLAHOMA. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA. No. 18–9526. Argued May 11, 2020—Decided July 9, 2020.
12 Αυγ 2020 · The Supreme Court’s Decision. The McGirt dispute arose within this complex jurisdictional context. Jimcy McGirt, a citizen of the Seminole Tribe of Oklahoma, had been tried and convicted in Oklahoma state court of perpetrating sex crimes against a child.
24 Ιουλ 2020 · On July 9, 2020, the Supreme Court announced its decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma—hailed by some as the “most significant Indian Law case of the century.” In a 5-4 ruling, the Court held that land reserved for the Muscogee (Creek) Nation in the 19th century remained “Indian country” for criminal jurisdiction purposes.
