Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
11 Ιαν 2009 · First, the sweeping general statement in John 2:24: “he knew all people.”. Second, the specific application of that statement to people’s private, inner life in John 2:25: “he himself knew what was in man.”. Third, the implication of that in verse 25: “he needed no one to bear witness about him.”.
It was about the sixth hour. Now when he was in Jerusalem at the Passover Feast, many believed in his name when they saw the signs that he was doing. But Jesus on his part did not entrust himself to them, because he knew all peo…
This paper attempts to exegete John 2:1-11 (The Miracle at Cana- Water turning into Wine) which is one of the most popular pericope’ found in the Johannine writings. By using different critical analysis methodologies and tools the paper presents as expository study on this selected text.
23 Now when he was in Jerusalem at the Passover Feast, many believed in his name e when they saw the signs that he was doing. 24 But Jesus f on his part did not entrust himself to them, because g he knew all people 25 and needed no one to bear witness about man, for g he himself knew what was in man.
With the result of the present investigation, it is hoped that the role of 2,23-25 in John 1–2 can be clarified by the interpretive insights embedded in the oldest available textual witnesses. These papyri and codices still speak today.
19 Αυγ 2004 · I believe our text tells us the reason: their faith was “sign faith.” John says, “Now while Jesus was in Jerusalem at the feast of the Passover, many people believed in his name because they saw the miraculous signs he was doing” (John 2:23). The faith of these saints is based upon our Lord’s signs.
23 Now when he was in Jerusalem at the Passover Feast, many believed in his name when they saw the signs that he was doing. 24 But Jesus on his part did not entrust himself to them, because he knew all people 25 and needed no one to bear witness about man, for he himself knew what was in man.
