Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
1 Ιαν 1990 · The appraisal theory of emotion suggests that an individual's cognitive appraisal of an event or situation produces different emotional states and guides subsequent behaviors, specific appraisals...
- Help Center
© 2008-2024 ResearchGate GmbH. All rights reserved. Terms;...
- Help Center
definition of an emotion remain unresolved and require theory as well as evidence to resolve. For example, is star- tie an emotion? Is pain or pleasure? Is empathy? Is aes- thetic emotions? Smith and lazarus (1990) recently elaborated on an idea, proposed earlier by Tomkins (1962, 1963), that sen-
The American psychologist Richard Lazarus played an important role in the post-World War II history of research on the emotions. This chapter offers an analysis of the challenges he faced in his attempts to account for the meaning of the emotions.
Lazarus formulates his psychobiological principle as. follows: If a person appraises his or her relationship to the environment in a particular way [e.g., as irrevocable loss], then a specific emotion [e.g., sadness] which is. tied to the appraisal pattern, always follows.
These include how to define emotion; whether to include physiological activity as a defining attribute; whether to dimensionalize or categorize emotions; how cognition, motivation, and emotions interrelate functionally; how to reconcile biological universals with sociocultural sources of variability; and how to classify the emotions.
The Lazarus Theory of Emotion proposes that cognitive appraisal plays a crucial role in determining emotions. It suggests that emotions are the result of an individual's interpretation and evaluation of a situation, rather than being solely driven by physiological responses.
Definition. The concept of cognitive appraisal was advanced in 1966 by psychologist Richard Lazarus in the book Psychological Stress and Coping Process. According to this theory, stress is perceived as the imbalance between the demands placed on the individual and the individual’s resources to cope (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984).
