Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
There is a class of arguments for God's existence called Ontological arguments. These are unusual because they try to argue for God's existence by pure reason alone, and typically give laymen and some critics the feeling that they are defining God into existence. The arguments essentially go as follows:
We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.
If it is even logically possible that God could have morally sufficient reasons for allowing evil and suffering to exist, then the argument fails totally. We do not even need to be able to identify these reasons!
I don’t think we can “prove” God’s existence. It’s a natural desire to want that surety. Yet, it’s part of the coming to know God to come to recognize that he is beyond proof.
3 Σεπ 2023 · We have the following logical considerations: Corollary 1. God does not-exist. (Follows from Axiom A) This does not negate God's existence, only assumes nonexistence. Corollary 2: God chooses to exist, even if God does not exist. (Follows from Corollary 1 and Axioms B & C)
4 Δεκ 2019 · In it, I will lay out the most popular arguments for and against God’s existence, show why attempts to prove God exists fail, but argue that there is good evidence that God does not...
4 Ιουλ 2023 · Some of the biggest debates in philosophy have centered on religion. Here are five arguments over whether God exists.
