Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
On January 13, 2014, Greco Antonious Beda B. Belgica (Petitioner) filed the instant Petition, seeking to declare all lump-sum appropriations in the 2014 GAA unconstitutional, including the specifically assailed appropriations.
The Issues. Based on the issues submitted by the parties in their pleadings, the Court is called upon to determine whether the lump-sum appropriations found in the 2014 GAA are unconstitutional for: 1. violating the doctrine on non-delegability of legislative power;
Challenges against lump-sum appropriations in the budget. Lump-sum appropriations and non-delegability or undue delegation. On the allocation of the power to prepare, enact, and implement the national budget, the Constitution provides: Article VI. Section 24.
To reiterate the rules on lump-sum appropriations, as established in the landmark case of Belgica I: 1. A lump-sum appropriation that allows the President to exercise his line item veto power is constitutional. 2. A lump-sum appropriation that prevents the President from exercising his line item veto power is unconstitutional. 3.
(1) The special budgets for lump-sum appropriations, special funds, bond funds, trust funds, other funds, receipts automatically appropriated, aids, and donations, required by section 7, paragraph I-(4), of Commonwealth Act No. 246, shall be prepared on the form which the Commissioner of the Budget shall prescribe for the purpose and submitted ...
28 Νοε 2022 · The current ruckus on the gargantuan lump sums — especially on the P9.3 billion “confidential and intelligence funds” — allegedly included in the proposed P5.268 trillion national budget for 2023 brings up once again the massive graft discussed in my Oct. 17 column titled “The penumbra of PDAF.”
The Special Budget shall include the complete details of the activities or projects covering the lump-sum appropriations with the corresponding cost up to the lowest level i.e., provincial, city or municipal level, as the case may be.
