Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
4 Νοε 2019 · Poisoning the well is a logical fallacy (a type of ad hominem argument) in which a person attempts to place an opponent in a position from which he or she is unable to reply. Examples and Observations
Poisoning the well occurs when negative information that is irrelevant is presented ahead of time to discredit the argument. For example, in a political campaign, candidate 2 presents negative information about candidate 1 (true or false) so that anything that candidate says will be discounted.
23 Μαΐ 2023 · What Is Poisoning the Well? ️ Poisoning the well fallacy arises when adverse information about a target is presented preemptively in order to discredit or ridicule the target’s subsequent claims. As such, it’s mostly used to weaken or refute an opponent’s argument before they make them.
21 Νοε 2023 · Learn about the poisoning the well logical fallacy. Discover the definition, structure, effects, and examples of the poisoning the well fallacy.
25 Ιαν 2021 · “Poisoning the well” is a logical fallacy that occurs when negative facts or suggestions about a speaker are given to an audience as a deterrent in an attempt to discredit what that person is about to say.
The fallacy known as poisoning the well involves presenting negative information about an opponent to preemptively discredit what he or she says. For example, let’s say the president is running for reelection, and her primary opponent is an up-and-coming politician whom few in the public have heard of.
To poison the well is to commit a pre-emptive ad hominem strike against an argumentative opponent. As with regular ad hominems, the well may be poisoned in either an abusive or circumstantial way. For instance: "Only an ignoramus would disagree with fluoridating water."
