Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
This systematic review and cross-validation study was conducted to address these limitations, thus increasing the measure's clinical utility. Sensitivity and specificity rates were calculated for the ≤6 and ≤7 cutoffs when data were globally combined and divided by clinical groups.
5 Απρ 2018 · Prior research has shown that cutoff scores of ≤6 or ≤7 on Reliable Digit Span (RDS) can detect suboptimal effort across numerous adult clinical populations; however, these scores have not been validated for that purpose in an adult epilepsy population.
6 Δεκ 2011 · Reliable Digit Span (RDS) is a heavily researched symptom validity test with a recent literature review yielding more than 20 studies ranging in dates from 1994 to 2011. Unfortunately, limitations within some of the research minimize clinical generalizability.
A Digit Span subtest (called as Reliable Digit Span, RDS) of WAIS was used to detect malingering. This study considered a score of 10% base rate as RDS cut-off score. Results. The RDS cut-off score was shown at 7 pts for military service group, at 3 pts for TBI group, at 6 pts for psychosis group, and at 6 pts for neurosis group. Conclusion.
19 Μαΐ 2011 · For Reliable Digit Span, the optimal cut-score was ≤6, with sensitivity of 51% and specificity of 92%. Although only moderately sensitive, Digit Span scores are likely to have good utility in identifying noncredible performance in relatively high-functioning older children and adolescents.
9 Ιουλ 2012 · The recommended cut-off scores for both RDS and TOMM were used to assess “pass rates” for this sample. Using an RDS ≤6, a pass rate of 65% (35 of 54) was obtained, which was well below the recommended 90% pass rate for an effective effort index (Donders, 2005).
Prior research has shown that cutoff scores of ≤6 or ≤7 on Reliable Digit Span (RDS) can detect suboptimal effort across numerous adult clinical populations; however, these scores have not been validated for that purpose in an adult epilepsy population.
