Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
The invitations under Rule 62a (1) and Rule 63 (1) are then sent jointly in a single communication setting the same two-month time limit for replying under both rules. Applicants wishing to reply to both invitations should do so at the same time.
30 Οκτ 2017 · You can authenticate documents in terms of Rule 63 of the Uniform Rules of Court (formerly High Court Rule 63). This method will form the basis of our discussion. Rule 63 prescribes that only certain documents may be authenticated using the process provided therein.
10 Ιουλ 2024 · The legal framework for proving wet-ink signatures is provided by Rule 63 of the Uniform Rules of Court, and The Convention of 5 October 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents (the HCCH 1961 Apostille Convention) as opposed to the various other Hague Conventions dealing with other matters, such as torture ...
23 Οκτ 2020 · According to Rule 63 (1) of the UNIFORM RULES OF COURT (High Court Rules), the terms “document” and “authentication” are defined as: ‘authentication’ to mean, when applied to a document, the verification of any signature thereon.
20 Σεπ 2016 · In order to circumvent this problem the High Court Act 59 of 1959 prescribes in Rule 63 of the High Court Rules of Court (hereinafter referred to as rule 63) the formalities to be complied with regarding documents which have been signed outside of South Africa.
9 Ιουν 2021 · 'authentication' means, when applied to a document, the verification of any signature thereon. The official procedures of authentication can be summarised as falling into one of three categories: Rule 63(2)(e) Procedure
Rule 63 of The Rules of the High Court of South Africa regulates the requirements for authentication where documents are signed/executed outside South Africa for use within South Africa.
