Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
The second and third petitions are preferred by two readers of "Sakal" who also challenge the constitutionality of the Act. Certain parties were allowed to intervene. They supported the Union of India, the respondent, in all these petitions and sought to uphold the validity of the Act and the Order.
- Hamdard Dawakhana
The Union of India, [1959] S.C.R. 12 and J. M. Near v. State...
- Ramesh Thappar V. State of Madras
Supreme Court of India Romesh Thappar vs The State Of Madras...
- Hamdard Dawakhana
“An Act to provide for the regulation of the prices charged for newspapers in relation to their pages and of matters connected therewith for the purpose of preventing unfair competition among newspapers so that newspapers may have fuller opportunities of freedom of expression.”
11 Αυγ 2021 · Know about: Sakal Papers vs Union of India, Freedom of Speech and Expression & restrictions on the business activities of citizens.
4 Ιουλ 2024 · In the 1962 case of Sakal Papers Ltd vs. Union of India, the Supreme Court of India examined the constitutionality of the Newspaper (Price and Page) Act, 1956 and its 1960 Order, which regulated the pricing and page limits of newspapers to control advertising space.
This is considered one of the landmark decisions that forwarded freedom of press jurisprudence in India, reinforcing that restrictions related to number of pages, price, advertisements, and circulation of newspapers, constitute a direct infringement on the freedom of speech and expression.
18 Ιουν 2021 · CASE NAME: Sakal Papers (P) Ltd., And Others vs The Union Of India. COURT: Supreme Court Of India. JURISDICTION: Original Jurisdiction Of the Supreme Court Under article 32 of constitution of India. CASE NO.: Petitions nos. 331 of 1960 and 67-68 of 1961. BENCH: Sinha, Bhuvneshwar P.(Cj), Sarkar, A.K., Gupta, K.C. Das, Ayyangar, N. Rajagopala ...
The case of Sakal Papers v. Union of India, which was decided asfar back as 1961 , raised questions of far reaching constitutional importance which have yet not been satisfactorily answered. Three of the critical questions raised in that case have been addressed in this paper: first , the exact nature and scope of free
