Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
2 Ιουν 2022 · Tort is a branch of private law. It focuses on interpersonal wrongdoing primarily between private persons. Unlike the law of contract, tort obligations are not normally entered into voluntarily; unlike the criminal law, the state is not necessarily a party to a tort action.
- Causation: in The Law
1. Introduction. Seemingly the central interests that...
- Legal Obligation and Authority
The idea is that merely having justice on one’s side is an...
- Economic Analysis of Law
Economic analysis of law applies the tools of microeconomic...
- Nature of Law
Others, however, are engaged in exploring new challenges....
- Legal Rights
It is often in the common good for law to grant certain...
- Causation: in The Law
22 Σεπ 2003 · Section 1 offers a brief overview of tort law and tort theory. Section 2 discusses economic analysis, which is the historically dominant tort theory and the primary foil for philosophical perspectives on tort law.
An act of God is defined as a direct, sudden, insanely violent, natural, and irresistible act of nature, one which could not by any amount of care have been foreseen, or if it has been foreseen, could not be avoided by any amount of care by any individual.
7 Οκτ 2017 · In short, the goal of tort law is to construct community. Tort doctrine acknowledges that two distinct kinds of community—closed and open—can generate the values that govern resolution of interpersonal disputes.
According to conventional wisdom, the normative source of modern tort law is mysterious. The reasons trace back to the state of nature. In a world without cen-tralized government, individuals protected themselves by exacting talionic revenge—“an eye for an eye”—on their injurers.
21 Ιουν 2021 · Acts of God are described as events that no human foresight can prevent, of which human wisdom is not obligated to perceive the possibility, and which, when they do occur, do not entail the responsibility to pay for the consequences that arise from them.
22 Ιαν 2004 · Tort law articulates distinctive conceptions of responsibility and fairness between persons. Taken together, they provide a way of understanding both how people can interact on grounds of justice, and why those who fail to interact on those terms must answer for the problems that result.
