Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
The challenge is to explain why an all-good God is more likely than an all-evil God. Those who advance this challenge assert that, unless there is a satisfactory answer to the challenge, there is no reason to accept that God is good or can provide moral guidance.
A number of philosophers have recently defended the evil-god challenge, which is to explain relevant asymmetries between believing in a perfectly good God and believing in a perfectly evil god, such that the former is more reasonable than the latter. In this article, I offer a number of such reasons.
dismissing belief in a good god? I develop this evil-god challenge in detail, anticipate several replies, and correct errors made in earlier discussions of the problem of good. The evil-god challenge Let's call the central claim classical of monotheism - that there exists an omnipotent, omniscient, and supremely benevolent creator - the good-god
12 Φεβ 2019 · This article argues that in fact evil God theodicies are more reasonable than good God theodicies by expanding upon arguments offered by David Benatar regarding the nature of existence, and David Hume regarding the asymmetry in our sensations of pain and pleasure.
We found 40 solutions for Wilt Chamberneezy, more familiarly. The top solutions are determined by popularity, ratings and frequency of searches. The most likely answer for the clue is SHAQ.
King James Version. 20 Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! Read full chapter. Isaiah 5:20 in all English translations.
7 Ιαν 2022 · An evil god would have the same qualities that theists ascribe to the God of classical theism, omnipotence, omniscience, and omnipresence, to name the most salient. The difference is that, while a good god is omnibenevolent, an evil god would be omni malevolent.
