Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
Learn the difference between act and rule utilitarianism, two versions of the consequentialist moral theory that focus on the effects of actions and types of actions. Compare the pros and cons of each view and the arguments for and against them.
Act utilitarianism is a theory of ethics that judges actions by their consequences for happiness. It contrasts with rule utilitarianism, which evaluates actions by their general rules. Learn more about its history, problems, and examples.
14 Οκτ 2024 · Act utilitarianism is a version of utilitarianism that evaluates actions by their effects on general happiness. It contrasts with indirect utilitarianism and other ethical systems that focus on duty or virtue.
Chapter. 2 Benthamand utilitarianism in the early nineteenth century. 3 Mill and utilitarianism in the mid-nineteenth century. 4 Sidgwick and utilitarianism in the late nineteenth century. 16 Utilitarianism and our obligations to future people. Get access.
20 Μαΐ 2003 · Act consequentialism is the claim that an act is morally right if and only if that act maximizes the good, that is, if and only if the total amount of good for all minus the total amount of bad for all is greater than this net amount for any incompatible act available to the agent on that occasion. (Cf.
Definition. Act utilitarianism is a moral theory that suggests the rightness or wrongness of an action is determined by the consequences it produces, specifically in terms of maximizing overall happiness or utility.
But act utilitarianism holds that all well-being – experienced by any being (human or otherwise), in any place (near or far), at any time (whether in the present or the remote future) – matters to the moral value of any individual act.
