Yahoo Αναζήτηση Διαδυκτίου

Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης

  1. 8 Αυγ 2015 · In aqueous solution $\ce{Fe2(SO4)3}$ dissociates into $\ce{Fe^{3+} (aq)}$ and $\ce{SO4^{2-} (aq)}$ ions. The sulphate ions will be solvated by hydrogen bonding with the water and the iron ions will form the hexaaquairon(III) complex, $\ce{[Fe(H2O)6]^{3+}}$.

  2. 11 Οκτ 2015 · $$\ce{2Fe^2+ + SO4^2- + 4H+ -> 2Fe^3+ + SO2 + 2H2O}$$ In the dilute acid, this equilibrium lies far to the left because the concentrations of $\ce{SO4^2-}$ and $\ce{H+}$ are rather low. However, making the acid more concentrated shifts the equilibrium to the right so that you get some of the products.

  3. 11 Μαΐ 2015 · As @Greg pointed out, oxygen appears to be acting as the oxidiser here and it forms $\ce{Fe2O3}$. There is not enough sulphate present in the starting materials to form only $\ce{Fe2(SO4)3}$ and hence the oxide is formed as well.

  4. 11 Σεπ 2015 · $$\ce{KMnO4 + FeSO4 + H2SO4 -> K2SO4 + MnSO4 + Fe2(SO4)3 + H2O}$$ I found out that manganese is reduced as the oxidation number goes from $+7$ to $+2$ and iron gets oxidized as the oxidation number goes from $+2$ to $+3$. I wrote the two half reactions, \eqref{Q:red} for the reduction and \eqref{Q:ox} for the oxidation. Did I get them right?

  5. 7 Ιουν 2021 · In this equation, the iron atom is reduced from + $3$ to + $2$. This is impossible in an oxidation with $\ce{O2}$. The oxidative action of $\ce{O2}$ cannot lead to a decrease of the oxidation number of an atom present in the reaction. The oxidation of $\ce{Fe2S3}$ must produce a ferric compound, like $\ce{Fe2(SO4)3}$ instead.

  6. In contrast, if $\ce{Fe2(SO4)3}$ were used, there would only be aqueous ions. At the copper surface, there is only a one-electron oxidation of $\ce{Cu}$ to $\ce{Cu+}$ . As the above article explains, without coordination of chloride, the $\ce{Cu+}$ would be essentially insoluble.

  7. It is clear that the reaction (Fe2) releases more energy and thus should be preferred over the other reaction. This means that we expect a yield of 100% Cu and not 150% Cu. Now that we have gathered some theoretical understanding of the matter, let's proceed to the interesting part, which is

  8. 26 Φεβ 2015 · Wikipedia tells me that the production of iron (III) sulfate is: 2FeSOX4 +HX2SOX4 +HX2OX2 FeX2(SOX4)X3 +2HX2O 2 F e S O X 4 + H X 2 S O X 4 + H X 2 O X 2 F e X 2 (S O X 4) X 3 + 2 H X 2 O. I was wondering if there was a difference between salt formation equation and production, because I thought it would've went something more like: 2Fe(OH)X3 ...

  9. 14 Ιουν 2018 · $$\ce{k4fe(cn)6 + kmno4 + h2so4 + h2so4 -> khso4 + fe2(so4)3 + mnso4 + hno3 + co2 + h2o}$$ My solution: $$\ce{a K4Fe(CN)6 + b KMnO4 + c H2SO4 -> d KHSO4 + e Fe2(SO4)3 + f MnSO4 + g HNO3 + h CO2 + i H2O}$$

  10. The molar mass of $\ce{Fe2(SO4)3}$ is $399.91 \, \text{g}/\text{mol}$. How would you go about solving a question like that? I'm confused about how to use only the quantity of sulfate ions to find the mass in grams of the whole sample, given it's grams per mole.

  1. Γίνεται επίσης αναζήτηση για