Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
Terry v. Ohio. No. 67. Argued December 12, 1967. Decided June 10, 1968. 392 U.S. 1. Syllabus. A Cleveland detective (McFadden), on a downtown beat which he had been patrolling for many years, observed two strangers (petitioner and another man, Chilton) on a street corner.
Terry v. Ohio (1968) ruled that police may stop and frisk a person they reasonably suspect to be armed and involved in a crime, without violating the Fourth Amendment. The case involved a police officer who stopped and searched two men who had been casing a store in Cleveland, Ohio.
After being sentenced to three years in prison, the Petitioner (Terry)—one of the three men—appealed his case, arguing that his search was a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. Terry involves a police tactic that remains controversial to this day: the stop and frisk.
Learn about the 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the legality of stop-and-frisk searches by police without probable cause. Find out the facts, arguments, and outcome of the case, and how it affected the Fourth Amendment and police-community relations.
Terry and two other men were stopped and frisked by a plain clothes policeman who suspected them of "casing a job, a stick-up." The Court ruled that the search was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment and upheld the conviction of carrying a concealed weapon.
The case involved a police officer who stopped and patted down three men suspected of casing a job, and found a gun on one of them. The Court held that the Fourth Amendment applies to such "stop and frisk" procedures, and that the search was reasonable and justified by the officer's safety.
13 Μαρ 2017 · Learn about the landmark Supreme Court case that established the constitutionality of a limited search for weapons based on reasonable suspicion. Find out the facts, issues, holding, reasoning, and significance of Terry v. Ohio (1968).
