Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
This paper moves away from this narrow conception of power and uses Susan Strange’s idea of “structural power.”6 Strange defines structural power as “the power to shape and determine the structures of the global political economy within which other states, their political institutions, their economic enterprises and their scientists and other pr...
She distinguished between relational power (the power to compel A to get B to do something B does not want to do) and structural power (the power to shape and determine the structure of the global political economy).
15 Φεβ 2018 · Susan Strange has developed the notion of ‘relational power’ in contradistinction to ‘structural power’ – power actors source not from the possession of resources, but from their capacity to control the structures (e.g. of security, production, finance and knowledge) that define the environment within which their interactions take place.
The contributors use Strange’s rich conceptual framework to explore the financial crisis and its aftermath, and reflect critically on the broader contributions which her work has made to the discipline of IPE. The volume makes three valuable contributions for scholars and students.
5 Ιουν 2019 · Susan Strange’s work on structural power particularly departed from Marxist or Gramscian traditions, she stressed the unintentionality and the difference with that of domination. See Strange ( Citation 1988 ).
28 Σεπ 2020 · In the mid-1980s many theorists of international politics had predicted the decline of American hegemony and the emergence of a multipolar world where relative capability gaps were narrow. 1 In response, Susan Strange argued that power in world politics does not follow from national attributes alone—which she called the “power base” that ...
24 Σεπ 2018 · In this article, we explore Susan Strange’s multidimensional and non-reductive international political economy (IPE) approach to structural power. Strange’s key weakness is the failure to account f...
