Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
The Court of Appeal issued a writ of mandate directing the superior court to vacate its order, insofar as it sustained Rykoff's demurrers to Lazar's causes of action for wrongful termination in violation of public policy, fraud and deceit, negligent misrepresentation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, and to enter a new order ...
Read Lazar v. Superior Court, 16 Cal.2d 617, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database
12 Μαρ 2014 · Plaintiffs failed to allege adequately that Apple misrepresented the conditions under which the iPad would operate or that they justifiably could rely on those representations in believing that the iPad would operate as they expected.
Facts Andrew Lazar was recruited by Rykoff-Sexton, Inc. (Rykoff), to relocate from New York to Los Angeles for a job...
Get Lazar v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 909 P.2d 981 (1996), California Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.
29 Ιαν 1996 · The trial court sustained Rykoff's demurrer in its entirety without leave to amend, leaving Lazar with only the Labor Code section 970 and breach of contract causes of action. Lazar unsuccessfully sought reconsideration, then a writ of mandate.
29 Ιαν 1996 · ANDREW LAZAR, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; RYKOFF-SEXTON, INC., Real Party in Interest. Prior History: [****1] Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. BC088634, Daniel A. Curry, Judge. Disposition: For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the Court of Appeal is affirmed.
