Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
The trial court sustained Rykoff's demurrer in its entirety without leave to amend, leaving Lazar with only the Labor Code section 970 and breach of contract causes of action. Lazar unsuccessfully sought reconsideration, then a writ of mandate.
29 Ιαν 1996 · The trial court sustained Rykoff's demurrer in its entirety without leave to amend, leaving Lazar with only the Labor Code section 970 and breach of contract causes of action. Lazar unsuccessfully sought reconsideration, then a writ of mandate.
29 Ιαν 1996 · The Court of Appeal concluded the allegations of the plaintiff in this case are adequate to state such a cause of action. For the reasons that follow, we agree. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
12 Μαρ 2014 · Plaintiffs failed to allege adequately that Apple misrepresented the conditions under which the iPad would operate or that they justifiably could rely on those representations in believing that the iPad would operate as they expected.
Lazar v. Superior Court (Rykoff-Sexton, Inc.) (1996) 12 Cal.4th 631 involved fraudulent statements regarding the company’s financial health, the growth of the department the plaintiff was to work in, and the security of his position. In Lazar, these falsehoods were made prior to the commencement of the employment.
Get Lazar v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 909 P.2d 981 (1996), California Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.
6 Ιαν 2021 · So, in Lazar v. Superior Court, the California Supreme Court held that Andrew Lazar could “seek damages for the costs of uprooting his family, expenses incurred in relocation, and the loss of security and income associated with his former employment in New York.” 909 P.2d at 992.