Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
17 ώρες πριν · Recent years have seen a global surge in affective polarization, extending from the US to European and Asian democracies. Concurrently, empirical research proliferates, exploring factors driving ...
- Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America ...
The rise of affective polarization—most notably, the...
- Affective polarization, local contexts and public opinion in America ...
7 Μαρ 2022 · Affective polarization refers to dislike and distrust of opposing partisans among members of the electorate, operationalized as a difference in warmth extended to one’s own partisans as opposed to co-partisans (Iyengar et al., 2012). Commonly, its rise is understood through the lens of Social Identity Theory.
23 Νοε 2020 · The rise of affective polarization—most notably, the tendency for partisans to dislike and distrust those from the other party 1 —is one of the most striking developments of...
1 Φεβ 2024 · Affective polarization, or relative dislike of opposing partisans, is associated with several negative outcomes for democracy. However, a number of studies argue that affective polarization has one positive democratic consequence: it spurs political participation.
1 Οκτ 2024 · Existing behavioral studies of affective partisan polarization only capture a subset of decision-making preferences and strategies. We apply an innovative experimental design, the Equality Equivalency Test (EET), to investigate a broader range of affective behavior toward partisan others.
We trace its origins to the power of partisanship as a social identity, and explain the factors that intensify partisan animus. We also explore the consequences of affective polarization, highlighting how partisan affect influences attitudes and behaviors well outside the political sphere.
24 Μαΐ 2023 · To examine this question, we explore the consequences for affective polarization among partisans when immigration—a policy issue that defines intense conflict within many party systems—is framed as a threat that could be linked to conflict with political opponents.