Yahoo Αναζήτηση Διαδυκτίου

Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης

  1. “what is art?” to “what do people think is art?” (Kamber 2011; Pign-occhi 2014; Winner 2018), results again reveal very little consensus. Table 1. Philosophical questions about the arts and their empirically testable offshoots.

  2. 18 Ιουλ 2019 · Our goal here is to help answer this question by using insights from cognitive pragmatics and the philosophy of language to augment institutional theories of art, and to show how this approach casts light on the art experience more broadly.

  3. 11 Ιαν 2021 · Here philosophers of art can undermine conceptual claims that it is not legitimate to value art cognitively on logical, historical, and, in virtue of empirical research, experimental grounds.

  4. 1 Ιουν 2019 · Psychology, Art, Philosophy. For centuries, aesthetics was effectively a branch of philosophy. The questions asked were philosophical ones that could be answered by reason and did not call for empirical evidence—questions such as: What is art? What is beauty? What makes a work of art great?

  5. 22 Νοε 2018 · This book is an examination of what psychologists have discovered about how art works—what it does to us, how we experience art, how we react to it emotionally, how we judge it, and what we learn from it.

  6. 2 Απρ 2019 · Senior researcher at Project Zero and Boston College Professor of Psychology Ellen Winner’s latest book, “How Art Works: A Psychological Exploration,” is based on years of research both at Harvard and BC, and looks at art through psychological and philosophical lenses.

  7. 6 Σεπ 2018 · This sort of synthesis—the bringing together of philosophy, psychology, art criticism, and neuroscience to explore the relationship between art and mind—is just getting started.

  1. Γίνεται επίσης αναζήτηση για