Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
18 Ιουλ 2019 · Our goal here is to help answer this question by using insights from cognitive pragmatics and the philosophy of language to augment institutional theories of art, and to show how this approach casts light on the art experience more broadly.
- Article Metrics
We would like to show you a description here but the site...
- Article Metrics
This framework demonstrates that a science of art appreciation must investigate how appreciators process causal and historical information to classify and explain their psychological responses to art.
Philosophers and critics have tried to define art in terms of one or more necessary and sufficient features, such as "significant form" (Bell 1913) or the expression of emotion (Collingwood 1938; Tolstoy 1930).
21 Δεκ 2011 · We review examples from literature, music, and the visual arts that illustrate the potential of this interdisciplinary collaboration and provide counterarguments to philosophical skepticism about the relevance of psychology and neuroscience to the philosophy of art and aesthetics.
1 Ιουν 2019 · For centuries, aesthetics was effectively a branch of philosophy. The questions asked were philosophical ones that could be answered by reason and did not call for empirical evidence—questions such as: What is art? What is beauty? What makes a work of art great?
1 Απρ 2013 · The psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation. Solid arrows indicate relations of causal and historical generation. Dashed arrows indicate information-processing and...
3 Νοε 2017 · In this article, we critique the “Two Cultures” view that separates art history from the history of science and holds that scientific methods are irrelevant to our philosophical understanding of art. By contrast to this view, we argue that the arts and the sciences are codependent phenomena.
