Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
1 Οκτ 2021 · We focus on a growing non-traditional stream in leadership theory—relational views of leadership—and examine the impact of this stream on leadership development professionals and their practice.
- Building bridges from the margins: The work of leadership in social ...
Leadership scholars argue that a functional requirement of...
- Advancing the science of 21st-century leadership development: Theory ...
Having clearly delineated learning outcomes for leader and...
- Building bridges from the margins: The work of leadership in social ...
1 Δεκ 2003 · However, their work serves as a strong example of how problems (e-leadership), theoretical concepts (adaptive structuration theory; transformational leadership theory) and leadership tools (AIT, GSS) are integrated to form an effective theory–practice symbiosis.
1 Οκτ 2021 · Having clearly delineated learning outcomes for leader and leadership development is crucial for advancing the science of leader and leadership development, from building better theory to having more appropriate evaluation outcomes to consider.
With extant literature questioning the added empirical value of these newer models, this paper aims to distil the best evidence about transformational leadership into a ‘primer’ that can help practitioners use evidence-led practices in their leadership development.
15 Νοε 2019 · Leadership theory, originally seen as a subset of management theory, evolved during the last century mainly from the world of business and commerce. The primary focus of the formal leader of any business-oriented organisation was the profit margin, frequently defined in monetary terms.
To do so, I introduce a framework composed of two features: whether theories (a) involve the study of leaders or leading (i.e., the person versus the process) and (b) conceptualize leadership as a cause or a consequence (i.e., an independent versus dependent variable).
24 Ιαν 2023 · We systematically review eight positive (authentic, charismatic, consideration and initiating structure, empowering, ethical, instrumental, servant, and transformational leadership) and two negative leadership styles (abusive supervision and destructive leadership) and identify valence-based conflation as a limitation common to all ten styles.
