Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
27 Μαρ 2022 · The Supreme Court’s decision in TransUnion L.L.C. v. Ramirez, 141 S. Ct. 2190 (2021), creates serious constitutional standing obstacles for consumer litigation in federal court, particularly for class actions and claims seeking statutory damages.
plaintiff filed a putative consumer class action in state court. 10 Although the plaintiff sued under a federal statute, the state and federal courts had concurrent jurisdiction.11 The defendant removed and a month later moved to dismiss (with prejudice) for lack of standing.12 The
It is well settled that in appropriate cases the federal courts may grant relief from prior judgments obtained by fraud.26 When the judgment being attacked was rendered by a state court rather than another federal court, relief may be had only in an independent action which attacks the prior decree.
In subsection (a)(2), the words “or any Federal agency” and “or any Federal agency, as the case may be” are omitted as unnecessary. In subsection (a)(3), the words “fraudulently obtained” are substituted for “thus secured and obtained” for clarity and to eliminate unnecessary words.
12 Ιαν 2011 · It focuses on the utterly decentralized nature of consumer protection law in the U.S. and the combined roles of federal, state, local, and private law in deterring, detecting, and punishing ...
The Court held that the alleged misrepresentations constituted consumer-oriented conduct under the statute – that is, the misrepresentations were contained in a manual that was marketed to and available for purchase by consumers.
Fraud and related activity in connection with obtaining confidential phone records information of a covered entity § 1040. Fraud in connection with major disaster or emergency benefits
