Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
A two-year cooling off period is required before an audit engagement partner can act as a reviewer for their former client. The reviewer must be competent and capable of performing the role including understanding the legal and professional framework, firm policies relevant to the engagement and have an appropriate knowledge of the client industry.
We understand the need for a “cooling off” period for serving as EQR partner. However, the two-year requirement may be burdensome for smaller firms. If the “cooling off” period is retained, we would highly recommend a one-year period. that operate under all three sets of standards.
1 Οκτ 2021 · This paper examines the association between the length of the cooling-off period and audit quality: (1) when partners rotate back and (2) during the cooling-off period, ahead of an extension...
This Industry Guide is intended for examiners conducting audits in the construction industry and as information for taxpayers and practitioners associated with the construction industry. Review
17 Δεκ 2018 · Integrated within MPR requirements, minimum cooling-off periods regulate audit quality at the time of a rotation-back. Within the context of a proposed extension to the minimum cooling-off period, we examine the association between the length of the cooling-off period and audit quality.
6 Ιουν 2023 · A project-accompanying audit (audit carried out ex-ante) requires a continuous deployment of the construction auditor over the entire project period. Within this assignment, interim reports will help to improve certain construction processes and influence further project processing.
18 Οκτ 2019 · This chapter discusses how the objective of the auditing section of the guide is to assist the independent auditor in auditing the financial statements of entities in the construction industry.
