Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
We understand the need for a “cooling off” period for serving as EQR partner. However, the two-year requirement may be burdensome for smaller firms. If the “cooling off” period is retained, we would highly recommend a one-year period. that operate under all three sets of standards.
The reviewer needs to consider whether the audit team has applied appropriate professional scepticism. A two-year cooling off period is required before an audit engagement partner can act as a reviewer for their former client.
1 Αυγ 2022 · This paper examines the association between the length of the cooling-off period and audit quality: (1) when partners rotate back and (2) during the cooling-off period, ahead of an extension to the minimum cooling-off period requirement in Australia.
It requires a one-year cooling-off period before public companies may hire former auditors from their current audit firm in senior-level accounting positions, assuming that the company wishes to retain the same audit firm.
With regard to both, calculation of the maximum duration and cooling-off period, national competent authorities are encouraged to closely monitor compliance by auditors with the intention and spirit of the rotation and cooling-off requirements, within the boundaries set by national legislation.
30 Μαΐ 2022 · A cooling-off period aims to mitigate any possible self- review threat or objectivity threat that may result from previous decisions made by the auditor during his previous employment (acting as the engagement partner).
Integrated within MPR requirements, minimum cooling-off periods regulate audit quality at the time of a rotation-back. Within the context of a proposed extension to the minimum cooling-off period, we examine the association between the length of the cooling-off period and audit quality.
