Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
28 Μαΐ 2006 · Descartes writes: “in order to remove . . . this . . . reason for doubt, . . . I must examine whether there is a God, and, if there is, whether he can be a deceiver” (AT VII 36: CSM II25). In the Third Meditation, Descartes offers an argument for the existence of a nondeceiving God.
This paradox emerges in Descartes' proofs of God's existence, and hinges on the relationship between the affirmation of God's existence and the elucidation of the idea of God, which is the basis for that affirmation.
28 Μαΐ 2006 · Summary. “I resolved one day to . . . use all the powers of my mind in choosing the paths I should follow” (Discourse Part I: AT VI 10: CSM I 116). Thus Descartes introduces his account of his celebrated first solitary retreat during the winter of 1619-20.
In this book, Stephen I. Wagner gives Descartes doubts their strongest force and shows how he overcomes those doubts, establishing with metaphysical certainty the existence of a non-
In geometry, Descartes' theorem states that for every four kissing, or mutually tangent, circles, the radii of the circles satisfy a certain quadratic equation. By solving this equation, one can construct a fourth circle tangent to three given, mutually tangent circles.
The Cartesian circle (also known as Arnauld 's circle[1]) is an example of fallacious circular reasoning attributed to French philosopher René Descartes. He argued that the existence of God is proven by reliable perception, which is itself guaranteed by God.
18 Απρ 2015 · Stephen I. Wagner, Squaring the Circle in Descartes' Meditations: The Strong Validation of Reason, Cambridge University Press, 2014, 244pp., $95.00 (hbk), ISBN 9781107072060. Reviewed by Georges Dicker, The College at Brockport: State University of New York
