Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
22 Σεπ 2008 · Appellant Egyptian Goddess, Inc., ("EGI") brought this action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, alleging that Swisa, Inc., and Dror Swisa (collectively, "Swisa") had infringed EGI's U.S. Design Patent No. 467,389 ("the 389 patent").
22 Σεπ 2008 · Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., 543 F.3d 665 (Fed. Cir.2008), United States of America. Date of Judgment September 22, 2008. Issuing Authority Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Level of the Issuing Authority Appellate Instance. Type of Procedure Judicial (Civil) Subject Matter Industrial Designs. Keywords.
Get Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., 543 F.3d 665 (2008), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today.
On March 21, 2003, Egyptian Goddess sued Swisa, Inc. and Dror Swisa for patent infringement in the Northern District of Texas, Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., et al. ; Civil Action No. 3-03-CV-0594-N. (JA23; JA37-JA40).
The unanimous en banc opinion in Egyptian Goddess v. Swisa, No. 2006-1562, slip op. (Fed. Cir. Sept. 22, 2008) (en banc) (“Egyptian Goddess II”) rejected the “point of novelty” test, and held that the 1872 Gorham v. White “’ordinary observer’ test should be the sole test for determining whether a design patent has been infringed.”
22 Σεπ 2008 · On September 22, 2008, in Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, No. 2006-1563, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in a unanimous en banc opinion, rejected the long-standing “point of novelty” test as a “second and free standing requirement for proof of design patent infringement,” holding that the “ordinary observer” test ...
29 Νοε 2007 · On August 29, 2007 a panel of the Federal Circuit affirmed the District Court for the Northern District of Texas’s grant of summary judgment for Swisa, Inc, on the grounds that no jury could reasonably find Swisa’s nail-buffer infringed Egyptian’s design patent.
