Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
22 Σεπ 2008 · Appellant Egyptian Goddess, Inc., ("EGI") brought this action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, alleging that Swisa, Inc., and Dror Swisa (collectively, "Swisa") had infringed EGI's U.S. Design Patent No. 467,389 ("the 389 patent").
22 Σεπ 2008 · Cir.2008) Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., 543 F.3d 665 (Fed. Cir.2008), United States of America. Date of Judgment September 22, 2008. Issuing Authority Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Level of the Issuing Authority Appellate Instance. Type of Procedure Judicial (Civil)
Get Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc., 543 F.3d 665 (2008), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.
Egyptian Goddess brought suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas claiming that Swisa had infringed their patent claiming a design for a fingernail buffer, consisting of a rectangular, hollow tube having a generally square cross-section and featured
27 Σεπ 2008 · Applying the newly-adopted test to the present case, the Federal Circuit affirmed, holding that no reasonable fact finder could find that an ordinary observer, familiar with the prior art, would deem Swisa’s design to be the same as Eyptian’s patented design.
On September 22, 2008, the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, handed down the most important decision in design patent law in nearly twenty-five years.1 Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc. ∗ J.D. Candidate, Franklin Pierce Law Center (2010); B.S.E., Electrical Engi-neering, University of Michigan, magna cum laude (2006).
INTRODUCTION. ¶1 The Federal Circuit’s decision in Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. Swisa, Inc.1 has and will continue to hinder patentees from protecting and enforcing valid design patents against potential infringers.
