Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
13 Απρ 2017 · When and why should the doctrine be (or not be) upheld? While many concepts in law and economics do not explicitly have a time dimension, once we start thinking about ex ante versus ex post, a large number of seemingly unrelated areas of the law involve similar issues of sequence.
In a series of articles in the takings and tax contexts, scholars rejected the conventional view of legal transitions as presenting a problem of unfair (ex post) surprise. Rather, they argued, it should be viewed as just an instance of the more general problem of decision-making under uncertainty.' Viewed from that. 3.
13 Οκτ 2024 · If I had to select only one theoretical tool for a first-year law student to master, it would be the ex post/ex ante distinction. (Of course, this is cheating, because there is a lot packed into the distinction.) The terminology comes from law and economics, and here is the basic idea: The ex post perspective is backward
The Ex Ante, the usual expression in Economic vocabulary, corresponds to the more traditional expression in Law of A priori, and refers to the apprehension of a situation before it is constituted. For example, a law or a regulation is an ex ante act, which will regulate situations after the adoption of the text, of the decision or general ...
When there is uncertainty about the value of a variable before a process has taken place, the estimate of this variable is called ‘ex-ante’. Ex ante is Latin for ‘beforehand’. When the process is finished and the variable known, the formerly uncertain variable is called ex post (after the fact).
ex ante is Latin for ‘beforehand’. When there is uncertainty about the value of a variable before a process has taken place, the estimate of this variable is called ‘ex-ante’. When the process is finished and the variable known, the formerly uncertain variable is called ex post ‘after the fact’.
14 Ιουλ 2009 · In legal theory, the ex ante versus ex post distinction arises most explicitly in relation to the legal principle that one cannot be convicted of a crime which is unknown to law at the time of the relevant action (nullum crimen sine lege). This principle of “non-retroactivity” is generally understood as one of the pillars of rule of law.
