Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
Faith is defined as “a confident belief in the truth, value, or trustworthiness of a person, idea, or thing.”15 Belief in the atoning work of Christ grants final deliverance from the lake of fire. This experience of faith is a one-time event where an unbeliever is regenerated and given eternal life.
We can claim that there are three clear major units to 15.1-16.3: (a) 15.1-11 dedicated to the theme of the need and the results of remaining or not remaining in Jesus. (b) 15.12-17 dedicated to Jesus' command that the disciples must love one another. (c) 15.18-16.3 dedicated to the theme of the causes and results of the hatred
Literary structure (chiasm, chiasmus) of Gospel of John. Chiastic Structure and Concentric Structure and Parallel of each pericope. A: God and only son. B: Through Jesus Christ. C: Grace for human. D: John. E: Coming into the world. F: Accepted and not accepted. A: Who is John. B: Messiah, Eliah, and the Prophet. C: Being sent.
First, 14:31 suggests a change of location (but see n.4, below). Second, 15:1-2 and 15:8 form an inclusio (Father and bearing fruit). Third, regarding change in theme, 14:27-31 references “going to the Father,” 15:1-8 references “abid [ing] in me,” and 15:9-11 references “abid [ing] in my love.”.
27 Ιουλ 2018 · Introduction. The purpose of this paper will be to conduct an exegetical study and commentary of the pericope commonly known as The Vine and Branches, or John 15:1-11, [1] through contextual analysis and systematic exegesis of the primary Greek terminology evident in the passage.
The present study is devoted to answering a simple yet profound question, “What is the fruit of the vine spoken of by Jesus in John 15?” All of the elements of the vineyard metaphor are defined by Jesus. The vinedresser is the Father. The true vine is Jesus. The branches are the disciples.
INTRODUCTION. The text of John 15 has been one of the historical battlegrounds of doctrinal interpretation. Perhaps only the passage in Hebrews 6 has been the scene of more battles between the Calvinistic and Arminian schools of interpretation concerning the matter of eternal security.
