Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
13 Μαρ 2017 · That is a key reason why Ludwig Wittgenstein’s On Certainty (Über Gewissheit) continues to be a living masterpiece, a deservedly classic work that remains highly relevant for our times.
4 Αυγ 2021 · The dialogue of Wittgenstein’s On Certainty with the different skeptical schools and arguments; Wittgenstein and the problem on the search for grounds, both in its metaphysical and in its epistemological strands;
An accessible guidebook to the themes and arguments presented in On Certainty; Takes into account the historical context and the philosophical topics explored by Wittgenstein; Provides close and careful scrutiny of individual parts, sections, and statements of this important philosophical work
8 Νοε 2002 · Considered by some to be the greatest philosopher of the 20th century, Ludwig Wittgenstein played a central, if controversial, role in mid-20th-century analytic philosophy. He continues to influence, and incur debate in, current philosophical thought in topics as diverse as logic and language, perception and intention, ethics and religion, ...
25 Σεπ 2008 · This article examines philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein's view on skepticism based on his book On Certainty. It explains that Wittgenstein has variously been held to refute skepticism by showing that it is self-defeating to reveal the truth in skepticism and to offer an accommodation with it and to diagnose the misconceptions that underlie ...
6 Απρ 2015 · Annalisa Coliva’s astute 2010 book, Moore and Wittgenstein: Scepticism, Certainty, and Common Sense, is an expansion and reworking of her 2003 Italian volume of the same title. Her introduction explains her intent to reorient the contemporary philosophical regard of Wittgenstein in two related ways.
6 Νοε 2020 · This chapter explores two influential conceptions of the role of common sense in philosophical theorizing from early analytical philosophy, due to G. E. Moore and Ludwig Wittgenstein. Both approaches set out an important function for our everyday certainties to play in the epistemological enterprise, albeit in very different ways.
