Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
Brief Fact Summary. Connecticut Welfare Department limits state Medicaid benefits for first trimester abortions to those that are medically necessary. Synopsis of Rule of Law.
- Skinner V. Oklahoma
Citation316 U.S. 535, 62 S. Ct. 1110, 86 L. Ed. 1655, 1942...
- Eisenstadt V. Baird
CitationEisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, 92 S. Ct. 1029,...
- Reynolds V. Sims
Citation379 U.S. 870 (1964) Brief Fact Summary. The...
- Saenz V. Roe
Citation526 U.S. 489, 119 S. Ct. 1518, 143 L. Ed. 2d 689,...
- Skinner V. Oklahoma
Roe and Poe, two indigent women, could not get a certificate of medical necessity from a doctor and challenged the validity of the regulation by suing Maher, the Commissioner of Social Services.
Facts of the case. In the wake of Roe v. Wade, the Connecticut Welfare Department issued regulations limiting state Medicaid benefits for first-trimester abortions to those that were "medically necessary." An indigent woman ("Susan Roe") challenged the regulations and sued Edward Maher, the Commissioner of Social Services in Connecticut.
The Connecticut Welfare Department passed a regulation limiting state Medicaid benefits for first trimester abortions to those that are “medically necessary,” a term defined to include psychiatric necessity.
31 Μαρ 2020 · Summary. In Maher v. Roe, the United States Supreme Court upheld a state’s regulation withholding public funding for abortion from poor women. Although the Court insisted that its decision signaled no retreat from Roe v.
Maher v. Roe Case Brief Summary: The case examines whether a state that participates in Medicaid has to pay for nontherapeutic abortions when it covers childbirth.
Although it found no independent constitutional right to a state-financed abortion, the District Court held that the Equal Protection Clause forbids the exclusion of nontherapeutic abortions from a state welfare program that generally subsidizes the medical expenses incident to pregnancy and childbirth.
