Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
Guide on Article 6 of the Convention – Right to a fair trial (criminal limb) European Court of Human Rights 7/122 Last update: 31.12.2020 I. General considerations of Article 6 in its criminal aspect 1. The key principle governing the application of Article 6 is fairness (Gregačević v. Croatia, § 49).
Article 6 § 1 of the Convention “1. In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a ... hearing ... by [a] tribunal ...” A. General requirements for applicability of Article 6 § 1 1. The concept of “civil rights and obligations” cannot be interpreted solely by reference to the
24 Ιουν 2023 · Article 6 § 1 of the Convention “1. In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a ... hearing ... by [a] tribunal ...” A. General requirements for applicability of Article 6 § 1 1. The concept of “civil rights and obligations” cannot be interpreted solely by reference to the
Guide on Article 6 of the Convention – Right to a fair trial (civil limb) be “civil” ones within the meaning of the Convention, although Article 6 does not itself assign any specific content to them in the Contracting States’ legal systems (James and Others v. the United Kingdom, § 81). 1. The term “dispute” 4.
Article 6 of the Convention – Right to a fair trial “1. In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law.
28 Φεβ 2022 · This article aims to fill a gap in scholarship by proposing an explicit, detailed, and analytical systematization of factors that, in light of ECtHR’s jurisprudence, may explain whether and to what extent the ECtHR defers to states in cases of amnesties/pardons concerning serious rights violations, including identification of ECtHR’s ...
7 Μαρ 2018 · from the implementation of EU migration and asylum law in its ever-expanding case law. The European Court of Human Rights has also delivered a number of important judgments, notably in the area of reception conditions of asylum seekers. In light of such changes, the handbook required an update to ensure that its legal guidance remains accurate.
