Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
[1] What are the consequences of mistakenly transferring money to an incorrect bank account? That is the question that arises for decision in this appeal. [2] The appellant is a customer of the third respondent (‘FNB’). On 31 December 2002 it instructed FNB to make certain payments to its creditors. One such creditor was TSW Manufacturing.
- RTF Format
CASE NO: 27/2004 In the matter between : NISSAN SOUTH AFRICA...
- RTF Format
nissan south africa (pty) limited v marnitz, nadia n.o. & 2 others, case no: (27/2004), (1 october 2004) size: 171.79 kb
Nissan South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Marnitz NO and others (Stand 186 Aeroport (Pty) Ltd intervening) [20 Case summary of the Nissan case, that dealt with the reversal of funds... View more
Nissan South Africa (Pty) Ltd v Marnitz and Others 2005 (SCA) Facts: On its customer's (the appellant's) instructions, Firstrand Bank Ltd (FNB) (the third respondent) transferred an amount in excess of R12 E million from the appellant's account to an account held by one of the appellant's creditors, TSW, at the Standard Bank ...
Date: 1 October 2004. Status: Immediate. NISSAN SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LIMITED v MARNITZ, NADIA N., KEEVY, KAREN N. AND FIRSTRAND BANK LIMITED. Please note that the media summary is intended for the benefit of the media and does not form part of the judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal.
The Supreme Court of Appeal today upheld an appeal by Nissan South Africa (Pty) Ltd against a judgment of the Witwatersrand Local Division of the High Court. In terms of the judgment a claim by Nissan South Africa (Pty) Ltd for the payment of an amount standing to the credit of Maple Freight CC (in liquidation) with First National Bank was ...
13 Απρ 2021 · In Nissan South Africa (Pty) Limited v Marnitz NO and others, the Court was required to decide whether a bank can unilaterally reverse a credit without the consent of the recipient. In...
