Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
Elstad, 470 U.S. 298 (1985), was a landmark Supreme Court of the United States case relating to Miranda warnings. [1] A house in the town of Salem, Polk County (most of Salem is located in Marion County), Oregon was burglarized. A witness to the burglary contacted the local sheriff's office and implicated an 18 year old neighbor, Michael Elstad.
When officers of the Polk County, Ore., Sheriff's Office picked up respondent at his home as a suspect in a burglary, he made an incriminating statement without having been given the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436.
Michael James Elstad was suspected of committing a burglary and was picked up by police officers in his home. Before officers had given the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona, Elstad made an incriminating statement.
Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298 (1985), was a landmark Supreme Court of the United States case relating to Miranda warnings.
Elstad was found guilty of burglary in the first degree. He received a 5-year sentence and was ordered to pay $18,000 in restitution.... Following his conviction, respondent appealed to the Oregon Court of Appeals, relying on Wong Sun and Bayer.
oregon v. ELSTAD 470 U.S. 298 (1985)The Supreme Court reaffirmed miranda v. arizona (1966) yet made another exception to it. For a 6–3 majority, Justice sandra day o'connor held that initial failure to comply with the miranda rules does not taint a second confession made after a suspect has received the required warnings and has waived his ...
Elstad was found guilty of burglary in the first degree. He received a 5-year sentence, and was ordered to pay $18,000 in restitution. Following his conviction, respondent appealed to the Oregon Court of Appeals, relying on Wong Sun and Bayer.
