Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
2[An Act to provide for the payment of bonus to persons employed in certain establishments and for matters connected therewith.] BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixteenth Year of the Republic of India as follows:— 1. Short title, extent and application.—(1) This Act may be called the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965.
Calculation of Bonus as per Bonus Act (Amendment of 2015) If the gross earning of your employees is below Rs.21000 you are eligible to pay a bonus. Calculation of bonus will be as follows: If Basic+DA is below Rs.7000 then the bonus will be calculated on the actual amount. If Basic+DA is above Rs.7000 then the bonus will be calculated on Rs.7000.
The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 provides for a minimum bonus of 8.33 percent of wages. The salary limited fixed for eligibility purposes is Rs. 3,500 per month and the payment is subject to the stipulation that the bonus payable to employees drawing wages or salary not exceeded to Rs.10000 per month would be calculated as if their salary or ...
6 Δεκ 2019 · The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 seeks to legally regularise the practice of paying bonus by different establishment. It offers an objective way to calculate the bonus based on profit and productivity. It enables the employees to earn over and above their minimum wages or salary.
The Full Bench of the Labour Appellate Tribunal established a bonus calculation formula in 1950. In 1959, a demand was made to change the formula.
impose a statutory obligation on an employer of every establishment covered by the Act to pay bonus to employees in the establishment; lay down principle and formula for calculation of bonus; provide for payment of minimum and maximum bonus and linking the payment of bonus with the scheme of set-on and set-off; and.
The Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 is a significant piece of legislation in India that governs the payment of bonuses to employees. While the Act was introduced with the objective of promoting employee welfare and ensuring fair distribution of profits, it has been subject to both praise and. Mill Owners Association v.
