Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
HIS PAPER explores religious interpretations of the 1945 atomic bomb-ings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. My goal in this paper is to challenge the presently prevailing atomic bomb discourse, which is bound by a nation-state framework, and to propose religious interpretations as alternative read-ings to these events.
20 Ιουλ 2020 · Scenarios resembling the Hiroshima dilemma today. Could a nuclear attack, like the one that destroyed Hiroshima, be legally justified today? In 2017, then STRATCOM Commander General John E. Hyten described how he thought about the rule of law:
In examining whether the atomic bombing was a reasonable decision, this thesis analyzes the important variables and competing interests that President Truman considered and concludes that the atomic bombing was a sensible and
The use of the atomic bombs against the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 is arguably the most controversial single act in the history of American warfare. Each bomb destroyed an entire city and killed tens of thousands of people in an instant, something that was shocking and terrifying...
29 Σεπ 2015 · Accordingly, the Allies were justified in conducting strategic bombing attacks, ultimately including the atomic bomb strikes, against Japan in 1944-45. But were the specific ways in which the atomic bombs were employed defensible? This question has received more attention.
United States justified using virtually any means to win the war. Thus the Allies' willingness to employ such savage weapons and methods of warfare as the flame-thrower, napalm bombs, and the obliteration bombing of urban centers disposed many Americans to condone the surprise use of the atomic bomb.10
6 Αυγ 2020 · A new book of photos documents the human impact of the bombings that ended World War II — and challenges a common American perception of the destruction in Japan. A view of Hiroshima in ...
