Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
24 Μαΐ 2011 · In an attempt to explain non-convergence of candidate positions in the 2000 and 2004 Presidential elections, a formal spatial stochastic model, based on intrinsic valence, is presented.
12 Νοε 2018 · Based on statistics gathered in the Annenberg 2000 Election Study & extensive interviews, the authors have compiled a comprehensive account of the 2000 presidential election, tracing the development of the rival campaigns throughout the year up to polling day.
Attitudes Toward the News Media and American Voting Behavior. Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 60, Issue. 4, p. 722. Identifying the Persuasive Effects of Presidential Advertising . American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 51, Issue. 4, p. 957. Beyond Negativity: The Effects of Incivility on the Electorate .
On November 2, 2004, the day of the United States presidential election, and in the months since then, many of us will have seen maps of the election results in which each state is colored (conventionally) red or blue to indi- cate whether more of their voters voted for the Republi- can presidential candidate (George W. Bush) or for the Democrat...
The United States presidential election of 2004 was the United States 55th quadrennial presidential election. It was held on Tuesday, November 2, 2004. Republican Party candidate and incumbent President George W. Bush defeated Democratic Party candidate John Kerry, the then-junior U.S. Senator from Massachusetts.
In 2004, roughly 44% of presidential candidate–sponsored political ads were negatively framed, with more than 90% of the attack ads featuring direct attacks against the opponent’s persona and/or policies.
1 Απρ 2005 · JAMES E. CAMPBELL examines how pre-campaign fundamentals and the campaign affected the 2004 presidential election.
