Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
29 Ιουλ 2021 · The first is research ‘for’ public policy, where researchers aim to recommend actions for tackling specific policy challenges. The second is research ‘about or on’ public policy, where researchers aim to recommend changes that improve policy making processes and structures (Lewis, 2005).
2 Νοε 2020 · Richard Owen and Mario Pansera analyze the notions of “responsible innovation” and “responsible research and innovation,” which call for both science and public policy to be anticipative, reflective, inclusive, open, and responsive.
12 Φεβ 2022 · This paper presents a framework to understand the impact of scientific knowledge on the policy-making process, focusing on the conceptual impact. We note the continuing dissatisfaction with the quality and effects of science-policy interactions in both theory and practice.
From the 1980s onwards, scholars sought to understand public policy by investigating 6 key elements (actors, institutions, networks/subsystems, ideas/beliefs, contextual factors and events) that interact in what is known as policy process (JOHN, 2003; CAIRNEY and HEIKKILA, 2014).
The policy species concept bridges knowledge of the policy process and knowledge in the policy process by creating an operationalized definition of public policy and suggesting a process for classifying policies to observe subsequent behavior.
2 Οκτ 2017 · This article systematically reviewed both peer-reviewed and grey literature for definitions of research impact to develop a definition of research impact that can be used to investigate how public health research influences policy.
14 Φεβ 2024 · Peer review is an ubiquitous feature of science with three interrelated roles: first, as a mechanism to assess quality through expert judgement (process); second, to decide on the distribution of scarce resources, e.g. publication space (outcome); and, third, to self-govern science (context).
