Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
Bakke decision, officially Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, ruling in which, on June 28, 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidated the use of racial quotas.
- Regents of the University of California v. Bakke - Quizlet
Does U.C.'s admission's policy violate Bakke's rights under...
- Regents v. Bakke Flashcards - Quizlet
Did the University of California violate the Fourteenth...
- Regents of the University of California v. Bakke - Quizlet
Does U.C.'s admission's policy violate Bakke's rights under the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause? Holding 1 They voted five to four that the specific admissions program was unacceptable because it discriminated against one group of people in favor of another on the basis of race.
Did the University of California violate the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, by practicing an affirmative action policy that resulted in the repeated rejection of Bakke's application for admission to its medical school?
Question. Did the University of California violate the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, by practicing an affirmative action policy that resulted in the repeated rejection of Bakke's application for admission to its medical school? Conclusion.
Regents of Univ. of California v. Bakke: Affirmative action programs that take race into account can continue to play a role in the college admissions process, since creating a diverse classroom environment is a compelling state interest under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that involved a dispute of whether preferential treatment for minorities could reduce educational opportunities for whites without violating the Constitution.
Bakke decision, ruling in which, on June 28, 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidated the use of racial quotas. The medical school at the University of California, Davis, as part of the university’s affirmative action program, had reserved 16 percent.
