Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
The Respondent, Bakke (Respondent), a white applicant to the University of California, Davis Medical School, sued the University, alleging his denial of admission on racial grounds was a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
5 Νοε 2018 · Case Summary of Regents of Univ. of California v. Bakke: A white medical school applicant was twice rejected from the Univ. of California Medical School, though he had better scores than minority candidates who were accepted.
A case in which the Court found that any racial quota for the purpose of admissions supported by a government entity violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that involved a dispute of whether preferential treatment for minorities could reduce educational opportunities for whites without violating the Constitution.
The University of California, Davis Medical School practiced a policy whereby it reserved 16 out of 100 places in its entering class for members of racial minority groups. A special committee was appointed to administer this admissions policy.
Bakke is a 1978 Supreme Court case which held that a university’s admissions criteria which used race as a definite and exclusive basis for an admission decision violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Find full opinion here.
14 Αυγ 2014 · Introduction. The Guarantee Clause of the U.S. Constitution provides, in relevant part, that “ [t]he United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican 1 Form of Government.” 2 The Supreme Court traditionally treated Guarantee Clause claims as nonjusticiable political questions, starting with the Supreme Court’s ...
