Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
22 Αυγ 2024 · If a governmental entity has the legal capacity to be sued and it has not waived service under Rule 4.1(c), it may be served by delivering a copy of the summons and the pleading being served to the following individuals: (1) for service on the State of Arizona, the Attorney General; (2) for service on a county, the Board of Supervisors clerk ...
- Rule 4 - Summons, Ariz. R. Civ. P. 4 | Casetext Search + Citator
A party subject to service under Rule 4.1 or 4.2 may waive...
- Rule 4 - Summons, Ariz. R. Civ. P. 4 | Casetext Search + Citator
The Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure Rules 4(d) state that the people listed below may affect service within Arizona. The persons must not be involved in the case and must swear to the date, and method of se
22 Αυγ 2024 · A party subject to service under Rule 4.1 or 4.2 may waive issuance or service. The waiver of service must be in writing, signed by that party or that party's authorized agent or attorney, and be filed in the action.
Rules of Civil Procedure for the Superior Courts of Arizona. Browse as List. Search Within. Scope of Rules - One Form of Action (§§ 1 — 2) Commencing an Action; Service of Process, Pleadings, Motions, and Orders; Duties of Counsel (§§ 3 — 6)
Rule 4.1. Service of Process Within Arizona. (e) Service of Summons upon Minors. Service upon a minor under the age of sixteen years shall be effected by service in the manner set forth in paragraph (d) of this Rule 4.1 upon the minor and upon the minor's father, mother or guardian, within this state, or if none is found therein, then upon any ...
14 Νοε 2012 · In support of the proposed amendment, the petitioners opine that their approach will solve three issues purportedly prejudicing the rights of claimants: (1) the difficulty in determining exactly which party, or parties, must be served, (2) the difficulty in identifying the proper party, or parties, authorized to accept service and (3) confusion ...
14 Νοε 2012 · As the Court is aware, Rule 4.1(j) has long allowed for service upon one member of a public body and that is the "default rule" when Rule 4.1(i) is not applicable. It makes no sense to allow this kind of service under one rule but not the other.
