Yahoo Αναζήτηση Διαδυκτίου

Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης

  1. The case of Sakal Papers v. Union of India, which was decided asfar back as 1961 , raised questions of far reaching constitutional importance which have yet not been satisfactorily answered. Three of the critical questions raised in that case have been addressed in this paper: first , the exact nature and scope of free

  2. 4 Ιουλ 2024 · In the 1962 case of Sakal Papers Ltd vs. Union of India, the Supreme Court of India examined the constitutionality of the Newspaper (Price and Page) Act, 1956 and its 1960 Order, which regulated the pricing and page limits of newspapers to control advertising space.

  3. globalfreedomofexpression.columbia.edu › cases › sakal-papers-p-ltd-v-the-union-ofSakal Papers (P) Ltd. v. The Union of India

    Case Analysis. Case Summary and Outcome. The Supreme Court declared that the Newspaper (Price and Page) Act, 1956 and the Daily Newspapers (Price and Page) Order, 1960 violated the constitutional right to free speech.

  4. The case of Sakal Papers v. Union of India, which was decided as far back as 1961, raised questions of far reaching constitutional importance which have yet not been satisfactorily answered.

  5. 21 Φεβ 2023 · The case of ‘Sakal Papers Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (1961)’ is considered a landmark case on freedom of press in India. In this case, three petitions wherein the constitutionality of the Newspaper (Price and Page) Act, 1956, and the Daily Newspaper (Price and Page) Order, 1960, was questioned.

  6. In this series of cases falls the Bennett Coleman case under review. The Bennett Coleman case arose in the following circumstances : In India, there is a shortage of indigenous newsprint. To fill the gap, newsprint has to be imported from foreign countries. As India's foreign exchange position is also not very comfortable, it is not possible to ...

  7. The decision in Hamdard Dawakhana (Wakf) v. Union of India (1) upon which reliance was placed by the respondent in support of the contention that where an enactment is challenged on the ground of violation of fundamental rights it is legitimate to take into consideration several factors including the purpose of the legislation, the mischief ...

  1. Γίνεται επίσης αναζήτηση για