Αποτελέσματα Αναζήτησης
The decision in Hamdard Dawakhana (Wakf) v. Union of India (1) upon which reliance was placed by the respondent in support of the contention that where an enactment is challenged on the ground of violation of fundamental rights it is legitimate to take into consideration several factors including the purpose of the legislation, the mischief ...
- Hamdard Dawakhana
PETITIONER: HAMDARD DAWAKHANA (WAKF) LAL KUAN,DELHI AND...
- Ramesh Thappar V. State of Madras
Supreme Court of India Romesh Thappar vs The State Of Madras...
- Hamdard Dawakhana
Sakal Papers (P) Ltd. v. Union Of India Mudholkar, J.— A matter of far-reaching importance affecting the freedom of the press is raised in these three petitions wherein the constitutionality of the Newspaper (Price and Page) Act, 1956, and the Daily Newspaper (Price and Page) Order, 1960, is questioned.
4 Ιουλ 2024 · In the 1962 case of Sakal Papers Ltd vs. Union of India, the Supreme Court of India examined the constitutionality of the Newspaper (Price and Page) Act, 1956 and its 1960 Order, which regulated the pricing and page limits of newspapers to control advertising space.
Petitioner: Sakal Papers (p) Ltd., And Others. Disposal Nature: Petition Allowed. Neutral Citation: 1961 INSC 277. Judgment Delivered by: Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.R. Mudholkar.
5 Απρ 2024 · In the Sakal Papers case, the Supreme Court of India struck down the provisions of the 1956 and 1960 Acts, holding them unconstitutional. This case marked a milestone in the development of constitutional law in India, specifically concerning the freedom of speech and expression.
Case Summary and Outcome. The Supreme Court declared that the Newspaper (Price and Page) Act, 1956 and the Daily Newspapers (Price and Page) Order, 1960 violated the constitutional right to free speech. The Act and Order regulated the prices publishers could charge for newspapers based on page count and the amount of content, with Sakal Papers ...
Sakal Papers v. Union of India.' It is the analysis of this case, both because it raises some critical questions going into the very heart of the nature of free speech, as well as the clarity of the judgment, that shall constitute a major part of this paper. In Sakal, an order under Section 3 of the Newspaper Act of 1956 was
